|
Post by PW3 on Oct 9, 2003 21:54:37 GMT -5
D@mn. They are good.
|
|
Wiltshire Waldo
Aspiring Reporter
Ministry approved news that matters to the Enemy
Posts: 4
|
Post by Wiltshire Waldo on Oct 10, 2003 0:24:00 GMT -5
I second Wiltshire Waldo's nomination of the Atlantic but I believe the category should be Worldwide Hegemonist. If you read their charter you will see that their aim is to control the UN. When they first started out their method was conquest. When that failed in Iraq, they turned to more devious means. ALL of the Pacifics with the exception of "the Pacific" are controlled by nations who are ACC members. As most of them have in excess of 400 endorsements, they do indeed control the UN although I believe that someone should do a study of how the delegates vote and how often. In addition ACC members control other regions as the UN delegate. I don't know all of them at this time but I believe Canada and Australia are two of them. A few of your facts are false. Atlantic's relationship with Australia is only that CommNet generously agreed to host a new, snazzy forum for the Australians to use after their old one died out. The Atlantic does not claim to control Canada.
|
|
|
Post by guest on Oct 10, 2003 17:26:57 GMT -5
Wiltshire Waldo So are you saying that Reubenlucy was never a lieutenant with the ACC's East Pacific Base and that True Domination did not drive Might Mof out of Canada for outing the ACC
|
|
Cynical Angels
Lazy reporter
Sitting on the fence, eating a sandwich
Posts: 16
|
Post by Cynical Angels on Oct 10, 2003 22:54:29 GMT -5
I've had a nation in Australia for ages and I can tell you, that region does not care one bit what happens the rest of NS. Reubenlucy may be delegate, but he's got only one or two more endorsements than a few others and delegacy regularly swaps between them. To my knowledge now or very few UN nations ever leave the region... why would they? Anyone controlling Australia would only control the 60something UN vote the delegate has. If anyone was controlling it in the first place. Which is well... hard to imagine ;D
|
|
Kandarin
Lazy reporter
Rejected Realms Delegate
Posts: 11
|
Post by Kandarin on Oct 11, 2003 0:02:11 GMT -5
I second Wiltshire Waldo's nomination of the Atlantic but I believe the category should be Worldwide Hegemonist. If you read their charter you will see that their aim is to control the UN. When they first started out their method was conquest. When that failed in Iraq, they turned to more devious means. ALL of the Pacifics with the exception of "the Pacific" are controlled by nations who are ACC members. As most of them have in excess of 400 endorsements, they do indeed control the UN although I believe that someone should do a study of how the delegates vote and how often. In addition ACC members control other regions as the UN delegate. I don't know all of them at this time but I believe Canada and Australia are two of them. They are indeed region-crashers and have a long history of encouraging their members to spam. You are wrong, however, in saying that they control the UN: -LadyRebels was once an ACC member, but now is not. Pilmour scared her away.(SP) -1 Infinite Loop is not an ACC member.(EP) -Norion is not an ACC member.(WP) -The Twoslit Experiment is not an ACC member.(NP) -I'm not an ACC member. Quite the opposite, in fact.(RR) -Jennivier isn't an ACC member.(RR) -The Delegate of Canada is not an ACC member. -The Delegate of Australia is an ACC member, but has no access to Regional Control.
|
|
|
Post by Melicanium on Oct 11, 2003 16:37:34 GMT -5
Um, I was wondering if you could put Francos (and InfernoIce and Poskrebyshev) under something for famous delegates (or, preferably, infamous delegates for them).
|
|
Geomania
Lazy reporter
I'm not a reporter...-_-
Posts: 25
|
Post by Geomania on Oct 12, 2003 19:37:52 GMT -5
How about KillerMonkeys, one of the greatest delegates of the South Pacific ever!
|
|
Geomania
Lazy reporter
I'm not a reporter...-_-
Posts: 25
|
Post by Geomania on Oct 12, 2003 19:40:29 GMT -5
Um, I was wondering if you could put Francos (and InfernoIce and Poskrebyshev) under something for famous delegates (or, preferably, infamous delegates for them). Sorry for the double post, but I MUST second this guy's nomination, since I'm on The Pacific's Banned list because of those biotches.
|
|
|
Post by U374 on Oct 12, 2003 20:20:38 GMT -5
Sorry for the double post, but I MUST second this guy's nomination, since I'm on The Pacific's Banned list because of those biotches. Thirded
|
|
|
Post by Ackbar on Oct 14, 2003 15:20:28 GMT -5
Not at home, sorry for using guest to add onto this, won’t happen in the future.
I think the Atlantic Alliance should be in the hall of fame, though it is a pickle as to which place to put them. They were really never very effective at invading or defending, though they got a lot of press, and are well watched and followed, which is why I would agree with their nomination.
Francos deserves nomination as well. He made an imprint on the game, for good or ill. As to which place to put him, I would tend to put him on invader, tho if you listen to the mods and how they have explained the situation he would go on defender.
RRA is a good group to put under defenders.
Also, I would agree with a lot of what Kandarin replied in terms of the AAC, but there a couple things I don't 100% know about. Lady Rebels claimed to quit AA, but I believe she is still posting on their boards-- not sure if it was an offical exit, or publicity.
|
|
|
Post by WorldNews on Oct 14, 2003 16:29:08 GMT -5
Thank you Acbar and of course great Thanks to all of you who have posted.
It seems that right now The ACC, The RRA and Francos is greatly awaiting their steps to the Hall of Fame. There has also been side notises like KillerMonkeys. I would like more information on the first 3 mentioned the ACC, The RRA and Francos on how and why they should be nominated. Under Francos I wonder if there are a strong appeal to also nominate InfernoIce and Poskrebyshev and mayby even Bertram.
But I am interested in more, always more. How about Crasher regions? Are there any specific crashers you would like to nominate? Evility? Holy Alliance? Empire of Power (the first and the second?)
Defenders? Defender regions? Single defenders that free lance? Small groups.. I know you have it in your hearts. If you don't dare to use your name, you are welcome to post it anonym.
|
|
|
Post by AckbarRedux on Oct 16, 2003 17:09:12 GMT -5
In adition to the RRA, who I would say are a strong protection group, I would nominate Kandarin. It is his strong leadership that has kept the RR together.
Also, I think a person of note could be Gres, who was the first to sucessfully unify the RR. He was also a member of AAC, tho I am not sure if he is arounf anymore.
As to KillerMonkey, he was somewhat important, but I am not sure he achieved a level worth being in a Hall of Fame.
The problem with nominating crashers is that most of them are rather ineffectual, witha few exceptions of course.
I would suggest Francos for invader, tho I see no reason to nominate his coherts. It seems clear he is the one in power there.
|
|
Kandarin
Lazy reporter
Rejected Realms Delegate
Posts: 11
|
Post by Kandarin on Oct 16, 2003 21:33:40 GMT -5
Gres is not a member of the ACC, although he is still active. He is actually a detractor of the ACC.
|
|
|
Post by Vazquez on Oct 17, 2003 2:53:52 GMT -5
I would say Atlantic as crashers.
|
|
|
Post by AckbarRedux on Oct 20, 2003 9:18:59 GMT -5
Gres is not a member of the ACC, although he is still active. He is actually a detractor of the ACC. Okay. I haven't seen him since he was in charge of the RR. I gave him a hard time about being in the AA, a bunch of stinking invaders (he didn't know I was an invader and in part playing it out in jest), and he said he was going to quit the AA. Last I saw of him...
|
|